The Productivity Commission (PC) has been tasked by the Australian Government to conduct an inquiry into creating a more dynamic and resilient economy. The PC was asked to identify priority reforms and develop actionable recommendations.

The PC has now released its interim report which presents some draft recommendations that are focused on two key areas:

· Corporate tax reform to spur business investment

· Where efficiencies could be made in the regulatory space (ie, cutting down on red tape)

The interim report makes some interesting observations and key features of the draft recommendations are summarised below.

Corporate tax reform

The PC notes that business investment has fallen notably over the past decade and that the corporate tax system has a significant part to play in addressing this. The PC is basically suggesting that the existing corporate tax system needs to be updated to move towards a more efficient mix of taxes. The first stage of this process would involve two linked components:

· Lower tax rate: businesses earning under $1 billion could have their tax rate reduced to 20%, with larger businesses still subject to a 30% rate.

· New cashflow tax: a net cashflow tax of 5% should be applied to company profits. Under this system, companies would be able to fully deduct capital expenditure in the year it is incurred, encouraging investment and helping to produce a more dynamic and resilient economy. However, the new tax is expected to create an increased tax burden for companies earning over $1 billion.

Cutting down on red tape

The interim report notes that businesses have reported spending more time on regulatory compliance – this probably doesn’t come as a surprise to most business owners who have been forced to deal with multiple layers of government regulation. Some real world examples include windfarm approvals taking up to nine years in NSW while starting a café in Brisbane could involve up to 31 separate regulatory steps.

The proposed fixes include:

· The Australian Government adopting a whole-of-government statement committing to new principles and processes to drive regulation that supports economic dynamism.

· Regulation should be scrutinised to ensure that its impact on growth and dynamism is more fully considered.

· Public servants should be subject to enhanced expectations, making them accountable for delivering growth, competition and innovation.

These are simply draft recommendations contained in an interim report so we are a long way from any of these recommendations being implemented. However, the interim report provides some insight into areas where the Government might look to make some changes to boost productivity in Australia.

The PC is inviting feedback up until 15 September on the interim report before finalising its recommendations later this year.

Non-compete clauses: the next stage

Back in March this year the Government announced its intention to ban non-compete clauses for low and middle-income employees and consult on the use of non-compete clauses for those on higher incomes. The Government has indicated that the reforms in this area will take effect from 2027. This didn’t come as a complete surprise as the Competition Review had already published an issues paper on the topic and the PC had also issued a report indicating that limiting the use of unreasonable restraint of trade clauses would have a material impact on wages for workers.

Treasury has since issued a consultation paper, seeking feedback in the following key areas:

· How the proposed ban on non-compete clauses should be implemented;

· Whether additional reforms are required to the use of post-employment restraints, including for high-income employees;

· Whether changes are needed to clarify how restrictions on concurrent employment should apply to part-time or casual employees; and

· Details necessary to implement the proposed ban on no-poach and wage-fixing agreements in the Competition and Consumer Act.

Treasury makes it clear that the Government is not planning to change the way the rules apply to restraints of trade outside employment arrangements (eg, on sale of a business) or change the use of confidentiality clauses in employment.

If the proposed reforms end up being implemented, then this could have a direct impact on a range of employers and their workers. Existing agreements will need to be reviewed and potentially updated. However, it is too early at the moment to guess how this will end up, we will keep you up to date as further information becomes available.